15 Research-Backed Teaching Best Practices That Actually Work (2025)
Effective teaching practises need more than just good intentions—they require solid research foundations. Recent studies reveal that students actively engaged with learning material are 45% more likely to master content deeply and persist through difficulties.
Proper teaching strategies do far more than create pleasant classrooms. Research demonstrates clear links between high student engagement and improved academic results alongside lower dropout rates. Group discussions and peer teaching consistently outperform traditional passive listening methods for student engagement. Teachers who implement personalised learning approaches typically see remarkable improvements in both student performance and motivation.
This guide presents 15 teaching practises with genuine research validation. These aren’t theoretical ideas that sound impressive yet disappoint in real classrooms—each strategy has proven effective across numerous educational settings. Seasoned professionals and new teachers alike will find these evidence-based approaches valuable for creating more effective, engaging learning environments.
Use Active Learning to Replace Passive Listening
Active learning shifts classroom dynamics from teacher-centred instruction to student-centred participation. Students move beyond simply absorbing information through lectures to actively joining the learning process through discussions, problem-solving, and teamwork.
Active learning definition and benefits
Active learning includes any teaching approach that fully engages students with educational content. This method puts students at the centre of their learning journey, emphasising how they learn rather than just what they’re learning. The benefits across educational settings are substantial.
Research clearly demonstrates that active learning sharpens critical thinking, boosts information retention, increases motivation, builds interpersonal skills, and lowers course failure rates. Students without active learning opportunities were 1.5 times more likely to fail compared to peers in active learning environments. A thorough analysis of 225 STEM education studies confirmed that active learning significantly improves course grades over traditional methods, particularly in smaller classes.
Active learning techniques that engage students
Teachers can transform passive classrooms with these proven techniques:
Think-pair-share: Students consider a question individually, discuss with a partner, then share insights with classmates
Small group discussions: Students collaborate to solve problems or explore concepts
Interactive lectures: Traditional presentations mixed with brief activities or questions
Problem-based learning: Students address real-world problems to develop critical thinking
Peer teaching: Students explain concepts to classmates, strengthening their own understanding
These approaches create opportunities for students to process information through thinking, writing, talking, and problem-solving, offering multiple learning pathways.
Active learning and knowledge retention
The most powerful argument for active learning comes from its impact on knowledge retention. Studies reveal active learning boosts engagement by 16 times and knowledge retention by 54% compared to traditional lectures. Students in active learning settings show 13 times more verbal participation and significantly higher nonverbal engagement through activities.
Despite these advantages, students sometimes resist active learning because it demands greater mental effort. Surprisingly, students in active classes felt they learned less while actually learning more. Teachers should therefore explain the value of increased cognitive effort and provide early assessments so students can recognise their actual progress.
Incorporate Formative Assessment and Timely Feedback
Formative assessment ranks among the most valuable tools teachers can employ, delivering remarkable learning outcomes. Research demonstrates these practises can double the rate of standard yearly progress. Such impressive results come from its core function: monitoring student learning to make timely instructional adjustments.
Formative assessment in teaching best practises
Daily activities form the heart of formative assessment, allowing teachers and pupils to check progress frequently. Unlike summative approaches, formative assessment starts with diagnostic evaluation to identify knowledge levels and gaps, helping teachers plan precise next steps. Educational assessment expert Dylan Wiliam outlines five essential strategies for effective formative assessment:
Clarifying learning intentions and success criteria
Creating discussions that reveal learning evidence
Delivering feedback that propels learners forward
Enabling students to become learning resources for peers
Supporting students as owners of their learning journey
Feedback strategies that improve learning engagement
Quality feedback drives formative assessment’s effectiveness. Teachers should deliver feedback within 24-48 hours to maintain learning context. Effective feedback must address three key questions: “Where am I going?” (feed-up), “How am I going?” (feed-back), and “Where to next?” (feed-forward).
Focus feedback primarily on task, subject content, and self-regulation strategies. While identifying specific errors helps, feedback offering clear guidance for improvement proves most beneficial. Research shows verbal feedback generally yields higher impact (+7 months) compared to written feedback alone.
Formative assessment vs summative assessment
Formative assessment monitors learning progress while summative assessment evaluates learning after instruction ends. This distinction creates practical differences. Formative assessments typically serve as low-stakes exercises with minimal point value, whereas summative assessments carry significant weight. Formative assessment guides ongoing learning through actionable feedback, while summative assessment measures achievement against established standards.
Summative assessments can sometimes serve formative purposes when students apply results to guide future coursework. The fundamental difference remains timing and purpose—formative assessment happens throughout learning to enhance outcomes, while summative assessment concludes learning experiences to measure achievement.
Apply the Think–Pair–Share Strategy
Image Source: Research Schools Network
Think-pair-share stands among the most straightforward yet effective teaching methods available today. Created by Professor Frank Lyman in 1981, this three-phase approach changes classroom interactions by ensuring every student engages with content through organised participation.
How think–pair–share boosts student participation
Research confirms that TPS markedly increases students’ willingness to contribute, with hand-raising occurring 1.7 times more frequently compared to traditional immediate response methods. This notable improvement comes from the confidence students gain through partner validation during the pair phase. Studies show students consistently report lower anxiety when using TPS versus standard questioning approaches. Even naturally quiet students participate more readily during the whole-class “share” segment when teachers implement this strategy.
TPS works because of its clear structure:
Think: Students quietly consider a question, often noting their thoughts
Pair: Students discuss with a partner, refining their understanding
Share: Selected pairs present their insights to classmates
This method gives students essential processing time before answering, resulting in more thoughtful responses and greater confidence.
Think–pair–share for different subjects
TPS shows remarkable adaptability across subject areas. Mathematics teachers find it particularly useful for problems with multiple solutions, including estimation, patterns, and logic exercises. Science educators similarly employ TPS for hypothesis development and interpreting experimental results. Research further indicates that TPS enhances quiz performance regardless of the subject being taught.
Think–pair–share and classroom equity
Most significantly, TPS promotes fairness by distributing classroom participation more evenly. Studies show the technique creates conditions where typically reserved students actively contribute. During paired discussions, allstudents share ideas and pose questions, regardless of their partner. This collaborative element builds a supportive atmosphere where students check their understanding before speaking publicly.
TPS also improves whole-class discussion quality, encouraging collaborative dialogue rather than isolated answers to teacher questions. By offering structured thinking time followed by low-pressure peer interaction, TPS particularly helps shy students who might otherwise remain quiet during class discussions.
Use Wait Time to Encourage Deeper Thinking
Image Source: Frontiers
Teachers typically wait less than one second after asking questions before seeking answers. This brief pause drastically limits student thinking capacity. Wait time—deliberately pausing between questions and responses—offers a simple yet powerful teaching tool that enhances learning outcomes significantly.
Wait time and cognitive engagement
Wait time fundamentally affects cognitive processing and learning quality. Mary Budd Rowe’s research discovered that extending wait time from the typical 0.9 seconds to at least 3 seconds produces remarkable changes in student language and logic. This small adjustment delivers substantial cognitive benefits—students provide more thoughtful answers supported by evidence. Additional studies confirm wait time helps students activate prior knowledge, consider possible responses, and process complex information thoroughly.
Student cognitive engagement during wait time follows specific patterns. Psychophysiological research shows students remain mentally engaged for two to three seconds after hearing a question and notably, they re-engage after approximately eight seconds. When questions demand analysis or synthesis, providing 20 seconds to two minutes enables deeper cognitive processing.
Wait time implementation tips
Effective wait time implementation includes:
Silently counting 3-5 seconds after asking questions before calling on students
Telling students why you’re pausing: “Take a moment to think about your answer”
Adjusting pause length based on question complexity—allowing longer pauses (up to 15 seconds) for open-ended questions
Avoiding the temptation to fill silence or rephrase questions too quickly
Extending pauses after student responses, allowing personal reflection before feedback
Research identifies three seconds as the minimum threshold for basic questions, while higher-level thinking demands additional processing time.
Wait time and student confidence
Extended wait time profoundly affects student confidence and participation patterns. With sufficient thinking time, quiet, introverted, or slower-processing students “become visible” in classroom discussions. Longer wait times correlate with fewer “I don’t know” responses and greater overall participation.
Adequate wait time fosters a classroom atmosphere supporting risk-taking, as students gain confidence through proper preparation time. This straightforward technique stands as one of the most powerful yet underutilised tools available to teachers seeking to enhance student thinking and engagement.
Design Lessons with Clear and Challenging Goals
Clear, challenging goals serve as essential guideposts for effective learning experiences. Research by Locke and Latham shows students with specific goals consistently outperform those without them. This powerful teaching approach creates purpose and direction, profoundly changing how students connect with learning materials.
Goal-setting in learning and teaching strategies
SMART goals provide a practical framework making learning objectives achievable. This proven approach ensures goals are:
Specific – Clearly defining the accomplishment
Measurable – Including progress tracking criteria
Attainable – Setting challenging yet realistic targets
Relevant – Connecting to broader educational aims
Time-bound – Establishing definite deadlines
Studies confirm SMART objectives help learners understand exactly what teachers expect. Teachers using SMART goals report better lesson structure and professional growth.
Balancing challenge and skill for engagement
Flow theory offers valuable insights into student engagement. Research shows flow emerges only when activities present above-average challenges requiring above-average skills. When both skill and challenge remain low, apathy typically results.
Setting high expectations while offering appropriate support creates ideal learning conditions. Students enter flow states when they grasp task purposes and see connections to learning objectives. Simple tasks lead to boredom, whilst overly difficult ones cause anxiety – making proper balance crucial for sustained engagement.
Examples of effective goal-setting in classrooms
Successful classroom implementation includes:
Co-constructing goals with high-ability students, giving them ownership and responsibility
Transforming general targets like “get better at Maths” into specific ones such as “achieve 75% on my final Maths exam”
Creating both long-term and short-term goals, breaking complex tasks into manageable steps
Appropriate yet challenging goals foster classroom cultures that welcome risk-taking and productive struggle. Beyond academic advantages, this approach builds valuable life skills including resilience and perseverance.
Leverage Peer Teaching and Student Modelling
Peer instruction ranks among the most potent teaching approaches available, yet remains surprisingly underutilised. Studies confirm it produces positive effects equal to approximately five additional months’ academic progress within a single school year. Students achieve this remarkable improvement when they take active roles in teaching concepts and evaluating learning outcomes.
Peer teaching benefits for metacognition
Students teaching others develop essential metacognitive abilities naturally. Research shows peer tutors often gain slightly more than the typical five-month progress advantage. Students participating in reciprocal peer tutoring demonstrate growing metacognitive regulation skills—particularly in orientation, monitoring, and evaluation. The act of explaining ideas to classmates forces students to clearly articulate their thinking, strengthening their understanding while promoting deeper information processing.
How to implement student modelling
Successful modelling hinges on making expert thinking visible to learners. Students need awareness of their strengths and limitations to become independent learners. Effective teachers:
Share their thinking process aloud during demonstrations
Confirm understanding through targeted questions
Reduce support gradually as student competence grows
Present multiple examples that highlight key process steps
After teacher demonstrations, small group sessions where students model for peers create valuable learning opportunities. This approach shifts students from passive watching to active participation, encouraging observations and questions that enhance understanding.
Peer teaching and collaborative learning
Structured peer learning works best when organised as intensive 4-10 week blocks with regular sessions 4-5 times weekly. Cross-age tutoring shows greatest success with age differences under three years, while ensuring content challenges tutees appropriately without overwhelming tutors.
Effective collaborative activities must balance group goals with individual accountability. Staff and tutor training proves essential, establishing clear session structures and frameworks for questioning and feedback. This organised collaboration builds both academic skills and social-emotional benefits, creating supportive learning communities where students freely express uncertainties and misunderstandings.
Use Gamification to Boost Motivation
Image Source: link.springer.com
Gamification brings a fresh dynamic to classrooms by engaging students’ natural drive for achievement and recognition. This approach applies the compelling elements of games to learning situations, creating environments where students eagerly participate and learn.
Gamification in education explained
Gamification means adding game-like features to educational activities—points, badges, leaderboards, and challenges. This differs from game-based learning, which uses actual games as teaching tools. The goal focuses on creating involvement levels similar to what games naturally produce, helping students master content while finding enjoyment in the process.
Effective classroom gamification typically includes:
Progress indicators showing achievement milestones
Point systems that measure accomplishments
Badges recognising specific skills or achievements
Leaderboards introducing friendly competition
Gamification tools and platforms
Teachers now have access to numerous platforms making gamification straightforward. Kahoot! turns standard quizzes into exciting competitions that boost student engagement and improve retention rates. ClassDojo provides complete classroom management through point awards and rewards. Additional valuable tools include Quizizz for interactive assessments, EdPuzzle for engaging video lessons, and Classcraft for role-playing experiences that build motivation and classroom community.
Gamification and student engagement outcomes
Studies consistently show gamification’s positive effects on learning. Research confirms that gamified learning environments enhance student engagement, motivation, attitude and academic performance. These benefits go beyond simple enjoyment—students develop deeper understanding of material and tackle more complex problems.
Game elements enhance both external and internal motivation, particularly helpful with challenging concepts. This dual benefit makes gamification especially valuable for difficult subjects. These approaches also support students with diverse learning needs through adaptable formats, making classes more inclusive while developing essential thinking and problem-solving abilities.
Integrate Culturally Responsive Teaching
Image Source: Education Week
Culturally responsive teaching connects diverse student backgrounds to academic achievement. This powerful classroom approach values the cultural knowledge students bring to their learning journey.
What is culturally responsive teaching?
Culturally responsive teaching (CRT) links students’ cultures, languages, and life experiences with their school learning. Gloria Ladson-Billings developed this framework in the 1990s around three key elements: student learning (academic achievement focus), cultural competence (using students’ backgrounds while learning about other cultures), and critical consciousness (applying learning to real-world problems). CRT recognises cultural backgrounds as strengths rather than deficits, nurturing these assets to boost achievement.
Geneva Gay later expanded this concept, noting that CRT works to “bridge the gap between teacher and student by helping the teacher understand the cultural nuances that may cause a relationship to break down”. This approach creates truly inclusive learning spaces beyond surface-level multicultural education.
Examples of culturally relevant content
Teachers successfully implement culturally responsive teaching by:
Getting to know students through surveys, interviews, and personal conversations
Selecting diverse books and resources that represent various cultures
Creating problem-solving activities using terms relevant to students’ interests
Using cultural stories and traditions as teaching tools
Allowing students to design projects inspired by their cultural backgrounds
Facilitating peer teaching where students share their cultural references
Impact on student belonging and engagement
Research highlights numerous benefits of CRT. Students show increased engagement, stronger critical thinking skills, and improved classroom belonging. For immigrant and refugee students particularly, culturally responsive approaches strengthen teacher-student relationships, directly improving school belongingness.
CRT creates classroom environments where all students feel valued, making learning personally meaningful and more accessible. This approach supports social-emotional development as teachers gain deeper understanding of their students. Through these connections, students build the trust needed for positive teacher relationships, ultimately making learning more accessible while building self-confidence.
Offer Multiple Means of Engagement (UDL Framework)
Image Source: University of Rochester
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) offers educators a powerful framework for creating inclusive learning experiences. Drawn from architectural principles and neuroscience research, UDL helps teachers remove unnecessary learning barriers so all students have equal opportunities to succeed.
Universal Design for Learning principles
UDL builds upon three core principles that connect directly with brain networks:
Multiple means of engagement (the “why” of learning) – Sparks motivation through choices aligned with student interests and identities, maintains effort via appropriate challenges, and builds collaborative community connections
Multiple means of representation (the “what” of learning) – Presents information in various formats to support diverse perceptual and comprehension needs
Multiple means of action and expression (the “how” of learning) – Provides multiple pathways for students to demonstrate knowledge while supporting executive functions
The core purpose of UDL focuses on developing “expert learners” who approach learning with purpose, resourcefulness, and strategy.
Designing inclusive learning activities
Effective UDL implementation demands thoughtful planning from the start rather than retrofitting existing materials. While differentiation typically begins with established content before making adaptations, UDL designs learning experiences around student needs from day one.
Teachers can adopt UDL by:
Redesigning one lesson at a time to present content through multiple channels
Using student surveys to discover interests and learning preferences
Giving assignment format options (presentations, videos, podcasts, discussions)
Creating assessments that welcome varied expression forms (digital portfolios, exhibitions)
Structuring courses with clear, consistent patterns that students can easily follow
Educators should focus on identifying environmental barriers rather than viewing students themselves as problems needing fixes.
UDL and diverse learning preferences
UDL recognises that no single approach serves all learners across all situations, embracing human variability as expected and valuable. This inclusive design benefits everyone in the classroom, not just students with identified learning differences.
Research shows UDL reduces the need for individual accommodations while boosting student engagement and retention. Students who select learning pathways matching their preferences develop stronger self-awareness and become more capable learners.
UDL also supports mobile learning and helps address digital access gaps by offering multiple content formats. Most importantly, this approach signals that schools truly value diversity, strengthening students’ sense of belonging in educational settings.
15 Research-Backed Teaching Best Practises That Actually Work (2025)
!Hero Image for 15 Research-Backed Teaching Best Practises That Actually Work (2025)
Effective teaching practises need more than just good intentions—they require solid research foundations. Recent studies reveal that students actively engaged with learning material are 45% more likely to master content deeply and persist through difficulties.
Proper teaching strategies do far more than create pleasant classrooms. Research demonstrates clear links between high student engagement and improved academic results alongside lower dropout rates. Group discussions and peer teaching consistently outperform traditional passive listening methods for student engagement. Teachers who implement personalised learning approaches typically see remarkable improvements in both student performance and motivation.
This guide presents 15 teaching practises with genuine research validation. These aren’t theoretical ideas that sound impressive yet disappoint in real classrooms—each strategy has proven effective across numerous educational settings. Seasoned professionals and new teachers alike will find these evidence-based approaches valuable for creating more effective, engaging learning environments.
Encourage Student Reflexion and Metacognition
Image Source: Education Endowment Foundation
Teaching students to examine their own thinking produces remarkable results. Harvard Business School research discovered that simple reflection activities improved performance by up to 25%. Metacognition shifts students from passive information recipients to active learning managers.
Metacognition in learning and teaching strategies
Metacognition consists of two essential elements: knowledge and regulation. The knowledge aspect involves students understanding their learning profile—strengths, weaknesses, and preferred study approaches. The regulatory component helps students plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning journey. Teachers who explicitly teach these strategies help students gain an additional seven months of learning progress.
Successful implementation happens when teachers demonstrate their own thinking, making their mental processes visible to students. Through this modelling, students adopt similar approaches for their learning challenges.
Reflexion activities that engage students
Several proven reflexion activities build metacognitive skills:
Glow and Grow – Students note something they’re proud of and something they want to improve
Snowball – Students write reflections, crumple their papers, toss them across the room, then read others’ anonymous thoughts
Metacognitive Testing – Students analyse test results to identify knowledge gaps and develop improvement plans
Weather Check – Students use weather metaphors to describe their learning states
These activities help students process information while developing awareness of their learning patterns.
Benefits of self-assessment and journaling
Self-assessment follows a cycle of three key actions: setting assessment criteria, seeking self-directed feedback, and engaging in reflexion. This process builds student autonomy and helps identify improvement areas.
Learning journals offer another powerful metacognition tool. Regular journaling builds self-awareness, enhances planning capabilities, and strengthens reflective thinking. E-journaling in online courses creates meaningful connections to learning goals while fostering personalised student-instructor interactions.
The true value of metacognitive practice lies in developing self-regulated, lifelong learners who can apply knowledge across different situations—a core aim of quality education.
Use Student Voice to Co-Design Learning
Student voice moves learners from passive recipients to active architects of their educational journey. This research-supported approach creates collaborative learning communities where students genuinely influence their educational experiences.
What is student voice in education?
Student voice represents “the individual and collective perspective and actions of students within the context of learning and education”. This concept, anchored in Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, acknowledges students’ right to express views on matters affecting them. Student voice works on two levels—expressing values and opinions while shaping instructional approaches based on their interests and ambitions. These dual aspects enable meaningful participation supporting students’ full development.
Co-designing lessons with students
Co-design welcomes students as partners in crafting educational experiences through:
Structured opportunities for students to share input on teaching methods
Regular forums for discussing learning concerns and interests
Collaborative solution-building sessions
Flexible design cycles that test and refine learning units
Effective co-design boosts engagement significantly, with students forming stronger connections to material and retaining information better. Teachers must balance student input with educational standards throughout this process.
Student voice and classroom ownership
When students help shape their learning environment, they develop genuine investment in their education. Research shows “students who believe they have a voice in school are seven times more likely to be academically motivated”. Classroom-level consultation builds essential trust between students and teachers while addressing equity concerns.
Successful implementation often requires staff training to overcome traditional classroom power structures. As one teacher noted, “A lot of teachers like to think it’s their classroom and they are the person in charge”. Shifting this mindset creates spaces where student input becomes valued rather than viewed as “treason”.
Build Classroom Norms That Support Risk-Taking
Fear stands as perhaps the greatest obstacle to student learning. Classroom norms supporting risk-taking prove essential for educational success. Students who feel comfortable making mistakes engage with challenging material more effectively.
Creating a safe space for learning engagement
Safe classroom spaces shield students from psychological harm—though “being safe is not the same as being comfortable”. Students must tackle uncomfortable issues to genuinely grow. Clear ground rules developed with student input “help to assure that peers are being inclusive and respectful in order to create an effective learning climate”. Teachers should address challenging behaviours directly, as students follow teacher cues during tense moments. This approach transforms difficult situations into valuable teaching moments rather than learning barriers.
Norms that reduce fear of failure
Fear consumes mental bandwidth needed for learning. Effective teachers:
Foster environments where “mistakes are less scary if blame, shame, and criticism are not present”
Present failure explicitly as “an opportunity to discover and learn”
Direct students to compare current skills with their past performance rather than peers
Establish rituals like “mistake of the day” celebrating errors and subsequent learning
Adopt language reframing mistakes as “beautiful mistakes” or “oopsies”
Students equating “failing a task” with “failing as a person” experience greater fear than those with stable self-worth. Helping students separate task results from personal value remains vital.
Encouraging divergent thinking in class
Divergent thinking helps students generate multiple solutions, nurturing innovation and creativity. Before applying convergent thinking, teachers should create exploration space without premature judgement. Successful implementation requires an “environment where no idea is wrong in this phase” while educators “defer any criticism and judgement”. Teachers should remind students that “sometimes the best solutions are the unexpected ones”.
Use Technology to Personalise Learning Paths
!Image
Image Source: British Educational Research Association – Wiley
Educational technology now extends far beyond simple digital textbooks, offering truly tailored learning experiences. Today’s adaptive systems analyse student performance data and deliver targeted content that meets each learner exactly where they stand in their educational journey.
Personalised instruction through edtech
Modern technology helps teachers manage diverse learning levels within increasingly crowded classrooms. Adaptive learning platforms use diagnostic assessments to gauge students’ existing knowledge, then customise content to match individual needs. These systems provide personalised learning through real-time adjustments to content, pace, and instruction, allowing students to progress independently while focusing on areas needing additional support.
Quality implementation requires deliberate planning. As France points out, “It’s not that we think tech’s bad, it’s that we want to be intentional with how we use it, and consider the impact it is having on kids.” Teachers must regularly question whether technology genuinely enhances individual student potential or simply adds unnecessary complexity without improving learning outcomes.
Adaptive learning platforms and tools
Effective adaptive platforms operate through several essential mechanisms:
Initial diagnostic tests assess students’ starting knowledge level
“Adaptivity factors” guide content personalisation
Real-time hints address misconceptions as they arise
Advanced students receive appropriately challenging material
Struggling learners gain additional support until mastery
These systems provide objective evaluations without the subjective biases that might affect teacher assessments. Additionally, they generate valuable data about student progress, enabling predictive analysis that identifies knowledge gaps requiring attention.
Balancing tech use with human connection
Technology should enhance rather than replace the human elements of teaching. While adaptive platforms efficiently personalise content, they cannot substitute the inspiration, motivation, and genuine care that teachers bring into classrooms. Practical implementation means designing activities that combine AI efficiency with human creativity.
Vogelsinger thoughtfully weighs whether tech streamlines learning or simply makes his job easier, noting, “Those little moments of personal interaction are precious in today’s world.” The most successful approach integrates technology while preserving opportunities for meaningful collaboration and relationship-building.
Automating routine tasks like data analysis and administrative duties actually enables stronger human connections by freeing teachers to focus on individual students’ needs. This balanced approach creates learning experiences that blend efficiency with meaningful human interaction.
Monitor and Manage Participation Equitably
Image Source: National Association for Multicultural Education
Classroom discussions typically feature the same 10-20% of students dominating conversations. This imbalance creates learning environments where most student voices remain unheard. Fair participation management ensures every student contributes, building a more inclusive educational space for all.
Tracking student participation fairly
Simple tracking tools uncover participation patterns teachers might miss. An “equity tracker” listing student names with contribution tallies reveals who speaks most frequently during lessons. This data often highlights patterns linked to gender, ethnicity, language background, and classroom seating position. Research shows that tracking alone helps teachers recognise unconscious biases when calling on students, naturally improving classroom equity without complex interventions.
Strategies to include quiet students
Shy students possess valuable insights that classroom dynamics often prevent them from sharing. Structured participation works better than random cold-calling:
Implement “Think-Pair-Share” so quiet learners can process thoughts and practise ideas with peers
Provide written options for introverted students who express themselves better in writing
Use “warm calls” by giving advance notice to shy students that you’ll seek their input later
Let students select partners occasionally, as quieter pupils participate more readily with trusted classmates
Tools for equitable classroom engagement
The “Ask, Wait, and Randomly Designate” framework offers powerful structure for balanced participation. First, pose questions to the entire class without pre-selecting respondents. Next, pause for at least three seconds—research confirms this waiting period increases willing responders and improves thinking quality. Finally, randomly select students using equity sticks (popsicle sticks with student names) to ensure fair contribution opportunities.
Additional effective approaches include “Four Corners” activities where students physically move to show opinions, “Talking Pennies” for distributing discussion turns evenly, and digital response systems enabling simultaneous answers from everyone—particularly helpful for students hesitant to speak publicly.
Collect and Act on Student Feedback Regularly
Image Source: Medium
Student feedback stands as a cornerstone of responsive teaching, though national surveys highlight this area as one where students report least satisfaction. Well-designed feedback systems turn this dissatisfaction into powerful learning opportunities for both pupils and teachers.
Feedback loops in teaching best practises
Quality feedback creates genuine conversations between teachers and students rather than one-directional messages. Through this exchange, students gain ownership of their learning journey while teachers acquire vital insights to refine their methods. Research confirms that effective feedback helps students set goals, evaluate ideas, and take control of their learning. Teachers employing these practices consistently report more dynamic, engaged classrooms. These ongoing dialogues foster environments where continuous improvement becomes the norm.
Using surveys and reflections effectively
Successful student input collection requires:
Twice-yearly surveys administered 6-8 weeks into each semester
Anonymous response options that encourage honest feedback
Focused questions targeting specific areas needing improvement
Open-ended prompts that uncover unexpected issues
Mid-year collection points rather than end-term only assessments
One physics teacher at Trinidad Garza Early College High School introduced a brief 5-10 minute in-class survey that led to notable improvements in physics scores. Studies show immediate feedback produces stronger performance gains than delayed responses, making prompt collection particularly valuable.
Closing the loop: showing students their impact
Responding visibly to student feedback—”closing the loop”—signals that student opinions matter. When pupils see their suggestions implemented, they provide more thoughtful feedback in future cycles. Effective response methods include posting summaries on learning platforms, discussing changes during class sessions, and creating visual displays of “Together we have” accomplishments. This partnership builds students’ sense of belonging within their academic community, boosting engagement and agency toward their studies.
Student feedback, when properly collected and acted upon, creates a culture where teachers and learners share responsibility for educational excellence.
Comparison Table
Teaching Practise | Key Benefits | Implementation Strategies | Research Evidence/Statistics | Challenges/Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Active Learning | Improves critical thinking, retention, and motivation | Think-pair-share, small group discussions, interactive lectures | Students 1.5x more likely to fail without active learning; 54% higher knowledge retention | Students may initially resist due to increased cognitive effort |
Formative Assessment | Yields learning gains at double yearly progress rate | Clarify learning intentions, engineer discussions, provide timely feedback | Verbal feedback shows +7 months impact vs written feedback | Must be delivered within 24-48 hours for effectiveness |
Think-Pair-Share | Increases student participation and confidence | Individual reflexion, paired discussion, whole-class sharing | Hand-raising 1.7x higher compared to traditional methods | Requires structured implementation for effectiveness |
Wait Time | Enhances cognitive processing and response quality | Count 3-5 seconds, adjust for question complexity | Minimum 3 seconds needed; 8 seconds for re-engagement | Teachers typically wait less than 1 second |
Clear Goals | Improves performance and direction | Use SMART framework, balance challenge/skill levels | Students with specific goals consistently perform better | Must maintain balance between challenge and skill level |
Peer Teaching | Develops metacognitive skills | 4-10 week intensive blocks, 4-5 sessions weekly | Average positive effect of 5 months’ additional progress | Requires clear structures and training |
Gamification | Increases engagement and motivation | Points, badges, leaderboards, challenges | Improves retention rates and problem-solving ability | Must balance external and internal motivation |
Culturally Responsive Teaching | Enhances belonging and engagement | Incorporate diverse materials, leverage cultural stories | Increases student engagement and critical thinking | Requires deep understanding of students’ backgrounds |
Multiple Means of Engagement | Removes learning barriers | Offer choices, flexible design, multiple expression formats | Reduces need for individual accommodations | Requires thoughtful initial planning |
Student Reflexion | Improves performance up to 25% | Glow and Grow, Snowball, metacognitive testing | +7 months learning progress when explicitly taught | Requires consistent practise and modelling |
Student Voice | Increases academic motivation | Create structured input opportunities, collaborative brainstorming | Students 7x more likely to be motivated when having voice | Requires overcoming traditional power dynamics |
Risk-Taking Norms | Reduces learning anxiety | Establish clear ground rules, celebrate mistakes | Not specifically quantified in article | Must balance safety with productive discomfort |
Technology Personalisation | Enables targeted learning paths | Diagnostic assessments, real-time adjustments | Not specifically quantified in article | Must balance tech use with human connection |
Equitable Participation | Ensures all voices are heard | Equity trackers, warm calls, random selection | Only 10-20% typically dominate discussions | Requires conscious monitoring of participation patterns |
Student Feedback | Improves engagement and agency | Bi-yearly surveys, anonymous responses | Immediate feedback shows larger performance increases | Must close feedback loop to maintain effectiveness |
Conclusion
This article has presented fifteen teaching practises backed by solid research that truly change how classrooms function. Unlike theoretical ideas, these approaches show measurable results across different educational settings. Active learning increases knowledge retention by 54%, while formative assessment delivers learning gains nearly double the yearly standard rate. Think-Pair-Share techniques boost student participation 1.7 times higher than conventional methods.
Teachers consistently find that implementing these strategies creates more engaged classrooms, deeper content understanding, and better learning outcomes. Just three seconds of wait time significantly enhances student thinking processes, while clear goals provide crucial direction for achievement. Peer teaching stands out particularly, offering benefits equivalent to five extra months of progress within a single academic year.
Research clearly shows that classrooms succeed when teachers shift from passive instruction to active engagement. Students develop stronger belonging through culturally responsive teaching, while UDL frameworks eliminate unnecessary learning barriers. Metacognitive practises build essential self-regulation skills that students apply across different contexts.
Teachers need not adopt all fifteen practises at once. Starting with a single approach—perhaps active learning or extended wait time—helps build confidence before adding more strategies. These practises work well together, with gamification naturally complementing technology personalisation, and student voice pairing effectively with feedback collection.
Education’s future depends on embracing evidence-based teaching rather than relying solely on tradition. Though some strategies may feel challenging initially, their proven impact on student success makes them valuable investments. Classrooms using these research-backed approaches create spaces where all students develop into confident, engaged learners ready for tomorrow’s challenges.
